What is your first impression of the site? Think of the “3
second rule.” (pg 31)
We thought the site
was boring, bland, simple, ads are distracting, serious. On a positive side the
site appears credible and simplicity goes both ways. Perhaps that is the goal
of the site.
How does this site establish credibility? How does it
establish trust? Or does it? (pg 28-29)
The simplicity and
name brand (BBC), work towards the credibility of the site. It also has serious
stories as the headliners (not a tabloid).
Authentic
voice?-Yes
Genuine?-Yes
Transparency?-Not the focus
What is the general writing style?
Biased?-Not the focus
Objective?-Seemingly
Does the writer IDENTIFY with his or her readers, or not?
How (or why not)?
No, the site seeks
for more traditional objective news stories.
Does the writing style get to the point?
Yes.
How is it arranged? Is it arranged in reverse pyramid style?
The stories
definitely carry a more traditional reverse pyramid style.
Is content shaped for scanning? How is the content layered?
(p 32)
Because the outline
of the story is laid out in the first paragraph (reverse pyramid), the content
and stories are shaped for scanning. Readers can scan the loose information in
the first paragraph and decide if the story is of interest.
Is the tone or rhythm of the site consistent throughout?
No, while most of the
site is angled towards more serious news, if you look at the US and Canada
page, it is more geared towards entertainment. Given what is going on between
the U.S. and Syria, you would think that a story on that issue would be more
fitting.
How does the site use headlines?
Broad subject moves
into story line.
How does it use links? Effectively or not?
Yes, links to the
side of the story direct the reader to other similar, relevant stories.
How is multimedia used? Is it distracting? How is it
displayed on the site? Does the multimedia tell the same story as the text, or
a different side of the story?
A slideshow at the
top of the home page scans through the day’s top stories. It catches the
readers attention, but in a good way. Multimedia seems to be saved more for
inside of the stories.
How does the site “package” stories? (pg 36)
The sites packages
stories by region (U.S. and Canada, Middle East etc.) and genre (sports, cars,
etc.).
How are graphics used?
Used to point out the
big stories on the page. The bigger the picture, the bigger the story. Graphics
are used to help tell the reader what the story is going to be about.
Too
cluttered?-No
Are the
graphics consistent through out the site, and consistent to the brand?-Yes, most graphics tie the story in some
way to a British angle
Do they
encourage or discourage use, and how?-Yes
because they link to relevant stories
Can each page stand on its own?
Yes, because you know
where you are but the story is the main focus of the page.
How is the navigation? Do you get lost? Do you always know
where you are? How (or why not)?
No, very well
organized and easy to sift through information.
How does the site incorporate/interact with its audience?
How does it embody the social aspect of the internet (or does it)?
Limited-Promotes
opportunity to follow on social media and share stories on social media. Also
allows for comments to create forums for discussion. Fits theme of site
however.
No comments:
Post a Comment